News traffic los angeles12/28/2023 ![]() 20 on the list at 23 percent congestion level. In Los Angeles, we spend 45 percent more time per commute trip than in free flow. ![]() The congestion percentage adds extra time to any commute. To come up with a score, Insurify and partners start with a “free flow” base, when traffic moves freely for all cities. In fact, every city except Chicago was located along the coasts: the Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf. So of the worst five, three were California cities. San Francisco was second at 39 percent, then New York at 35 percent Seattle, 34 percent San Jose, 32 percent. The City of Angels had a congestion level of 45 percent. So it didn’t surprise me on Friday morning when I popped open my inbox and found Insurify, an online insurance site - working with TomTom’s Traffic Index and the 2012-2016 American Community Survey - had ranked Los Angeles No. All had too many cars and not enough space. The time of day, the direction, the geographic location didn’t matter. Of course, the inevitable common denominator was traffic. We went to Zuma Beach, Hollywood, Santa Monica, The Huntington Library and Botanical Gardens, Old Pasadena and Mt. What do you do when you have out-of-town guests? Naturally, you show them the sights. Los Angeles officials are considering a congestion pricing system, but the as-of-yet undefined policy is already proving controversial among members of Metro’s Board of Directors.A friend who visited recently is considering moving to Southern California. Meanwhile, in many European cities, transportation officials have adopted “policies that reduce roadway performance and capacity in favor of public transport, cycling and walking.” In Singapore, for example, traffic flows relatively freely due to an aggressive congestion pricing policy. Still, the authors of the report point out that congestion levels mean different things for different cities. Numbers like these could go up in future years, as LA’s population increases and rates of car ownership continue to rise. In Los Angeles, the financial cost of traffic reached $9.3 billion in 2018, which shakes out to about $1,800 per person. On the 101, drivers hit daily delays of 13 minutes between Hollywood and Downtown LA.Īs the report indicates, congestion is more than an inconvenience: It can have economic consequences due to “time loss, increased pollution rates, and higher incidents of accidents.” ![]() On the 10 freeway between the 405 and the 110, drivers encountered delays of 19 minutes per day. Two stretches of freeway made INRIX’s list of the most traffic-clogged U.S. Still, some roadways in LA are just as congested as any in the nation. The authors of the report note that Los Angeles’s sprawling landscape and lack of a unified urban core may be keeping traffic slightly lighter relative to cities like New York and Boston, where gridlock intensifies around the downtown area. ![]() On an international level, Los Angeles traffic levels are the 47th-worst in the world-far behind first place Moscow, where drivers lost 210 hours sitting in traffic last year. Chicago and New York all beat out LA’s traffic during peak commuting hours. In the current ranking, Boston Washington, D.C. Two years ago, Los Angeles topped a similar list released by INRIX, but the company has updated its ranking process since then and now finds that the cost and length of delays is worse in other traffic-clogged urban areas. Those lengthy delays helped to make LA the fifth most congested city in the U.S., by the company’s metrics. Los Angeles drivers spent, on average, 128 hours stuck in traffic last year, according to a new report from transportation data tracker INRIX. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |